Why the CV is failing

The argument, and the evidence

The document has not changed. Everything around it has.

The format is usually traced to a letter Leonardo da Vinci wrote to the Duke of Milan in 1482, listing what he could build. Five hundred years later the shape is much the same: a list of what you have done, in reverse order, sent to someone you have never met.

A hundred and eighty applications is not a reading task. It is a sorting task, and the first pass is done by software looking for keywords.

So the document has to do two incompatible things at once. It has to survive a parser that wants plain text in a predictable order, and it has to hold the attention of a person who will give it about eleven seconds. Most people solve this by writing for the machine and hoping the person forgives them.

What has changed is the volume

180 applicants, one role. One of them lifted clear.
12.9%
New Zealand underutilisation — around 406,000 people unemployed, underemployed, or unable to get the level of work they need. Stats NZ
180+
Applicants a single Auckland or Wellington role can draw. Advertisements up 6%, applications up 7%. SEEK NZ
18.7%
Auckland youth unemployment. Stats NZ
17,000
People attended one Auckland job fair in March 2026. RNZ

Figures as at August 2026 and will change — quoted for illustrative purposes.

The answer is not a better-looking CV. It is to stop asking one document to do both jobs.

Send the machine something it can read.

Give the person somewhere to go.